Between the bright orange “no trucks on 216th” signs pasted on the windows of Betty and Eugene Nelson’s Walnut Grove home, and the skull and crossbones banner hanging on the Forest Hills subdivision sign in their front yard, the couple are making it clear: they do not want trucks from the new 216 Street Interchange travelling past their home.
Since the project was first announced in 2015, they have feared what may happen when their “little country road” becomes a direct connection to Highway 1 and Willoughby. But it wasn’t until recently, when the stakes were put in the ground, that they realized just how much their quality of life could be affected.
A wooden stick wrapped in orange flagging tape indicates that a new 10-foot high sound attenuation wall will be installed in the centre of the retired couple’s hedge, about 17 feet from their house on the corner of Telegraph Trail and 216 Street.
Meant to mitigate noise from the estimated 17,350 cars (originally estimated at 22,000) that will be using the new thoroughfare every day, the couple fear that in their particular location, the wall will do more harm than good.
There will be a large gap in the wall in front of their house where Telegraph Trail connects to 216 Street — which may reduce the wall’s effectiveness — and the towering structure will block light from coming into their bungalow.
“We could have a truck in our house one night,” Betty added.
There are financial impacts as well. The couple, both aged 79, will be looking into replacing their windows with triple pane glass, and on top of that, their home was devalued by $95,000 in this year’s property assessment.
While they understand why the interchange is being built, and have no objections to it serving the south side of the freeway, they do believe there should be a ban on truck traffic on the north end.
Township in ‘ironic position’
Currently, 216 Street from 88 Avenue north to 96 Avenue is designated a truck route, but the portion between Highway 1 and 88 Avenue is not.
The merit of changing this stretch to a truck route was discussed at length during Monday afternoon’s council meeting, where staff revealed that trucks will be allowed to use 216 Street regardless of whether it is designated a truck route.
The Township has no jurisdiction to stop a truck from leaving a provincial highway or freeway, and if it does leave the highway, it must go to the closest truck route, CAO Mark Bakken explained
In the case of the new interchange, the most immediate path is up 216 Street to 88 Avenue.
“If council does not designate that as a truck route (between Highway 1 and 88 Avenue), it still remains for trucks to access and egress on that road provided they’re coming from 88 Avenue or those other points,” Bakken said.
“We have no ability to block that. Our statement that it’s not a truck route is merely our desire that trucks limit their use to it. If you will, it’s a preference, but there’s no enforcement ability, there’s nothing we can do to stop them from going in that area. It’s just a statement.”
That statement also comes with a cost, he said. The addition of 216 Street to the truck route network would make it a candidate for MRN (Major Road Network) funding. That would increase annual operations and maintenance revenues from TransLink by $302,400 ($21,000 per lane kilometre) and make it eligible for annual funding for upgrades.
“So we’re in a bit of an ironic position that if the area is not designated as a truck route, the region does not pay for it,” Bakken said. “The trucks will still use it, but the region will not pay for that truck route for the improvements to that road at all. Instead it will be the local residents or the Township residents, through taxes, that will be paying for that. The irony is that, of course, people are opposed to the truck route. But that comes as part of the parcel of having the interchange where trucks can access and egress the freeway or highway itself.”
After a 6-2 vote by council, the Township will now initiate an application to TransLink to designate 216 Street from 88 Avenue to Highway 1 as a truck route, and 216 Street from Highway 1 to Highway 10 as a truck route. Staff will also conduct a public information session, and bring forward amendments to the highway and traffic bylaw for council to vote on should TransLink approve the modifications.
In addition, council unanimously voted in favour of removing several truck route designations in the Fort Langley area, including: on Glover Road from Rawlison Crescent to River Road; on 96 Avenue from 216 Street to Glover Road; on 88 Avenue from 216 Street to Glover Road; on Mavis Avenue from River Road to Glover Road; on River Road from Mavis Avenue to 240 Street; and on River Road east of 264 Street.
Unlike 216 Street, these roads are not eligible for MRN funding.
They will also be adding truck designations on Rawlison Crescent from 232 Street to 240 Street and on 240 Street from Rawlison Crescent to River Road.