An aerial photo of Brookswood in 1973. Some lots retained trees, but others were flattened to make way for what was then brand new housing. (Langley Centennial Museum photo)

Painful Truth: Green space and green growth often at odds in Langley

How do we build an eco-friendly community, develop housing, and preserve tree cover?

A few weeks ago, the vacant lot across the street from me had all its trees knocked down.

This is no surprise. I live in Willoughby, along with nearly a third of all other Langley Township residents (yes, there are that many of us). I often say that, as a reporter covering Township council, I cannot complain about development taking place near my home. I knew it was coming, I’ve known it was coming for years before I moved in.

I will miss the trees. They provided shade and habitat for birds and squirrels, field mice and hawks and rabbits, and most likely raccoons and coyotes frequented the area.

The loss of trees to development in Willoughby is often decried by people living in Brookswood, and sometimes in Walnut Grove.

Of course, they have an advantage over Willoughby – they were developed decades ago.

Consider the view from the sidewalk on the 208th Street overpass, looking north.

Today if you stand there, you will see rooftops of houses and townhomes peeking out amid the deciduous foliage. More distantly, there are tall stands of Douglas fir and cedar in the ravines. Clearly, Walnut Grove was developed with more care than Willoughby.

Except, it wasn’t.

I stood on the overpass 20 years ago, when it was brand new. The area north of the overpass was coloured in beige, taupe, and salmon, the colours of the vinyl and stucco siding applied to pretty much every house built in the 1990s.

There were trees, but they were spindly little things, saplings and street trees that seldom stood higher than an adult. Replacement trees.

Walnut Grove was largely levelled for development, because that’s how development works on any lot smaller than a quarter acre. It has trees now because Walnut Grove was built between the early 1980s and the late 1990s. It’s been 20 to 35 years since most development wrapped up – guess how old most of the trees are?

It’s even the same story in Brookswood, famous for its trees. Aerial photos from the early 1970s show patches of forested land intermixed with new homes – which sit on lots that are either entirely bare, or have one or two lonely trees left.

Go back even further in Langley history – go for a walk in Campbell Valley, or Williams Park, or on the trails near Langley City’s Buckley Park. You can find the massive stumps of old-growth cedars, complete with the notches where boards were hammered into the trunks – men stood on those boards to operate huge hand saws, felling those trees a century or more ago.

Between about 1880 and 1920, pretty much all of what is now Metro Vancouver was flattened by logging. Photos from shortly after that time often appear apocalyptic – farm houses and barns sit in the midst of endless fields that stretch off to a distant line of trees where the saws haven’t yet reached.

The truth is, unless you live on a houseboat, trees were cut down to create your neighbourhood. A lot of them.

Even as trees come back in areas like Walnut Grove and Brookswood, we know there won’t be as many of them as there were before the loggers and homesteaders and, finally, suburban builders arrived.

The way Langley is growing now is a trade off, and it can be an ugly one.

We’re building denser housing. That means fewer places among the townhouses and condos and small lots of Willoughby for future trees. The core areas of Willoughby will never resemble Brookswood, where quarter-acre lots allowed a suburban forest to partially re-grow after development.

On the other hand, if we don’t choose greater density, we spill out farther into sprawl. Willoughby has far fewer miles of impermeable road and sidewalk per person than Brookswood. It has more opportunities for future transit, for fewer cars, for walking or biking to nearby destinations. It is less green in terms of trees, but it is greener in many other ways that matter. Through its density, it spares land and tree elsewhere – an invisible victory.

I want a denser, walkable Langley that helps fight suburban sprawl. I also would love to live somewhere with more trees – if you’d like to send me about a million dollars, I’ll move to a property in Brookswood myself.

How do we reconcile the way we develop land with the need for greater density?

I don’t know.

I know I would like our leaders to start taking that question more seriously. Ideas around green roofs and walls, around density bonuses to save stands of trees, around pocket parks and passive parks, have been batted around the council with increasing frequency. Some are included in the new Brookswood OCP. Some are encouraged, but not mandatory.

It took years for the Township to pass a tree protection bylaw. It took months to declare a climate emergency.

Maybe, in a little less time, we could create a plan to encourage tree planting, in neighbourhoods old and new. To encourage parks and preserve stands of trees even on lots undergoing development.

Between public and private lands, incentives, and education, how many trees do you think we could plant in Langley? Maybe 10,000? 50,000? 100,000?

It wouldn’t be free, but what investment is? Making Langley greener – literally and figuratively – would soak up a lot of carbon from the atmosphere, and give Langley shade, habitat, and beauty for generations to come.

BrookswoodColumnistEnvironmentforestryFort LangleyLangleyOpinion

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

 

Four men posed while logging in Murrayville in the 1910s. (Langley Centennial Museum photo)

Just Posted

Vandals deface Aldergrove elementary school with racist slur, male genitalia

Langley School District confirms it has filed a report with the Langley RCMP

‘Our hands are tied’: Langley Good Times Cruise-In announces cancellation due to COVID-19

People are encouraged to donate to the chosen Langley charities online, said Cruise-In director

Langley Township lifts evacuation alert as flooding threat drops

People are still advised to avoid the Fraser River due to fast running water

Sources receives $70K from SurreyCares

Funds will help with warehouse space for food programs in Surrey, White Rock, Langley

Conservationists in race against time to rehabilitate grizzly cubs transferred to Aldergrove zoo

‘Let them be assessed now before their fate is sealed,’ urges B.C. conservationist Barb Murray

B.C. sees 25 new COVID-19 cases, community exposure tracked

One death, outbreaks remain in two long-term care facilities

B.C. Ferries increasing passenger capacity after COVID-19 restrictions

Transport Canada 50-per-cent limit being phased out, no current plans to provide masks

Once-in-a-lifetime comet photographed soaring over Abbotsford

Photographer Randy Small captures Comet NEOWISE in early-morning sky

BREAKING: Amber Alert for two Quebec girls cancelled after bodies found

Romy Carpentier, 6, Norah Carpentier, 11, and their father, Martin Carpentier, missing since Wednesday

Bringing support to Indigenous students and communities, while fulfilling a dream

Mitacs is a nonprofit organization that operates research and training programs

B.C. man prepares to be first to receive double-hand transplant in Canada

After the surgery, transplant patients face a long recovery

Grocers appear before MPs to explain decision to cut pandemic pay

Executives from three of Canada’s largest grocery chains have defended their decision to end temporary wage increases

Man shot dead in east Abbotsford suburbs

Integrated Homicide Investigative Team called to investigate

RCMP ‘disappointed’ by talk that race a factor in quiet Rideau Hall arrest

Corey Hurren, who is from Manitoba, is facing 22 charges

Most Read